Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: partial application warning unreliable?
Date: Thu, 08 Dec 2005 13:39:11 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1134009551.10435.24.camel@rosella> (raw)

I have this:

# let f x y = x + y;;
# let a = f 1; 1;;
Warning F: this function application is partial,
maybe some arguments are missing.
val a : int = 1

This is good -- I rely on it!
class cc = object (self) 
  method f x y = x + y 
  method g () = self#f 1;  
end;;

Warning F: this function application is partial,
maybe some arguments are missing.

yea, good ..


    method add_nonterminal (s:string) (sr:range_srcref) (toks:
Flx_parse.token list) (term:ast_term_t) =

...
    state#add_nonterminal tok (Flx_srcref.slift sr) t;

Method has 4 arguments, but the call applies to only 3.

Woops, no warning!! Bad! This error of mine caused a serious
bug -- the method call didn't do anything!

Really this just shouldn't be allowed at all!
We have ignore() function, IMHO its use should be required
(except at the top level interpreter where you want to see
the type of a term).

But the point is .. the warning is unreliable! Why?

In my real code the only difference is that the
method being called is not visible -- it is called
via a class interface.

-- 
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sf dot net>
Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net


             reply	other threads:[~2005-12-08  2:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-12-08  2:39 skaller [this message]
2005-12-08  3:10 ` [Caml-list] " Jacques Garrigue
2005-12-08  7:11   ` skaller
2005-12-08 14:41     ` Damien Doligez
2005-12-08 23:51   ` malc
2005-12-09  1:43     ` skaller
2005-12-09  2:15       ` Jacques Garrigue
2005-12-09  2:56         ` skaller
2005-12-09 15:26         ` malc
2005-12-10  0:49           ` Jacques Garrigue
2005-12-10  1:40             ` malc
2005-12-09 12:21       ` Andreas Rossberg
2005-12-09 17:17         ` skaller
2005-12-09 17:52           ` Andrej Bauer
2005-12-09 18:54           ` Andreas Rossberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1134009551.10435.24.camel@rosella \
    --to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox