From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375A3D460 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:44:08 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA98i7kV032363 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:44:07 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA01852 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:44:06 +0100 (MET) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id jA98i48W017989 for ; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 09:44:05 +0100 Received: from rosella (ppp7-104.lns1.syd7.internode.on.net [59.167.7.104]) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jA98gJhg033141; Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:12:20 +1030 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ANN: Sexplib - library for S-expression conversions From: skaller To: Markus Mottl Cc: Florian Hars , yaron jane , ocaml In-Reply-To: References: <4370C853.9090309@hars.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 09 Nov 2005 19:42:19 +1100 Message-Id: <1131525739.13828.59.camel@rosella> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4371B6D7.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4371B6D4.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 markus:01 mottl:01 lgpl:01 restrictive:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 exception:01 linking:03 library:03 library:03 conversions:04 bsd:04 licence:05 licence:05 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 On Tue, 2005-11-08 at 13:29 -0500, Markus Mottl wrote: > Sorry for the confusion, but I should have mentioned in my > announcement that it is available under the LGPL including the special > exception also employed by INRIA to work around the linking > restrictions. I use the acronym LGPLX for that licence. > In case you have downloaded the library, you may have > seen that it was already distributed that way. Thus you don't have > any excuse now for not using the library ;-) Unless you're redistributing source code under a less restrictive licence eg BSD, MIT, etc ;( -- John Skaller Felix, successor to C++: http://felix.sf.net