From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E31C3BDDB for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:49:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from ash25e.internode.on.net (ash25e.internode.on.net [203.16.214.182]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id j7RBnGrR013865 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 13:49:18 +0200 Received: from rosella (ppp27-60.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [59.167.27.60] (may be forged)) by ash25e.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id j7RBn6BF030550; Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:19:07 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from skaller@users.sourceforge.net) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] LablGL on Ubuntu? From: skaller To: Sven Luther Cc: Chris Campbell , caml-list@yquem.inria.fr In-Reply-To: <20050827012113.GC29153@localhost.localdomain> References: <20050826224607.GA21237@localhost.localdomain> <1125101097.25384.103.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050827012113.GC29153@localhost.localdomain> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-n2T+f+rqxxW4Zwm6KYrR" Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2005 21:49:06 +1000 Message-Id: <1125143346.7794.6.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.1.1 X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 4310533C.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 lablgl:01 sven:01 luther:01 ocaml:01 packagers:01 wrote:01 sourceforge:01 sourceforge:01 debian:02 debian:02 external:02 external:02 applied:04 differences:05 X-Attachments: type="application/pgp-signature" name="signature.asc" X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.3 (2005-04-27) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.3 --=-n2T+f+rqxxW4Zwm6KYrR Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2005-08-27 at 03:21 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: > > There are some differences I have discovered, for example > > Debian and Ubuntu use distinct documentation 'help' systems. >=20 > Cosmetical and external stuff though, It is still the debian ocaml packag= ers > who do all the job. Cosmetic and external stuff though, it is still Inria developers that do the main job .. :) > > And: Debian does not support AMD64. Ubuntu does. >=20 > Sure, Debian does support AMD64, it is not in the official archive yet It's on Alioth, my ISP doesn't mirror it, and the same quality control isn't applied to it, since it is still under development. --=20 John Skaller --=-n2T+f+rqxxW4Zwm6KYrR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDEFMxsRp8/9aGVGsRAozBAJ0UYRX3GrgzNxE6RqcYc+jG1hbhUQCghxdK ia7tTeinEsFFsVQ+u6ALPDI= =CuIM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-n2T+f+rqxxW4Zwm6KYrR--