From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Damien Doligez <damien.doligez@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Parameter evaluation order
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 17:12:34 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124781154.8832.12.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <254E6767-A097-455B-872B-483725D26744@inria.fr>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1251 bytes --]
On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 18:50 +0200, Damien Doligez wrote:
> Suppose you want to evaluate a curried function call in left-to-right
> order:
> f e1 e2 e3 e4
>
> You must evaluate f first, then e1. Then you must apply f to e1, giving
> a new function g1. Then you must evalue e2, then apply f1 to e2, giving
> f2, etc.
>
> That's because f might do some side effects between its arguments.
what data, and possibly annotations, would be required to solve this
problem?
For example if all functions are total and pure
then the above problem vanishes.
Felix doesn't permit functions to have side-effects,
however this isn't enough for full optimisation in
the presence of exceptions, for example. Additionally,
lazy evaluation can save the setting of a variable,
a sufficient condition being purity (non-dependence on variables
as well as having no side-effects) *and* totality.
Seems like these properties:
* writes variables (side-effect)
* reads variables (side-dependence)
* raises exception
* fails to terminate
impact evaluation strategy. It would be good to know which
properties of things would allow which evaluation strategies.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-23 7:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-19 22:21 "Márk S. Zoltán"
2005-08-20 9:12 ` [Caml-list] " Alain Frisch
2005-08-26 17:53 ` "Márk S. Zoltán"
2005-08-22 16:50 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-23 7:12 ` skaller [this message]
2005-08-23 11:29 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-23 13:34 ` Igor Pechtchanski
2005-08-23 19:52 ` Damien Doligez
2005-08-24 1:24 ` Hao-yang Wang
2005-08-24 11:33 ` [Caml-list] " Damien Doligez
2005-08-24 14:39 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-24 15:47 ` Berkeley DB Joel Reymont
2005-08-24 16:08 ` [Caml-list] Re: Parameter evaluation order brogoff
2005-08-24 20:05 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-24 20:25 ` brogoff
2005-08-24 20:53 ` Jon Harrop
[not found] ` <430CE193.9000805@univ-savoie.fr>
2005-08-26 9:53 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 10:10 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-26 12:09 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 12:26 ` Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
2005-08-26 16:48 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-27 15:33 ` Christophe TROESTLER
2005-08-26 12:36 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2005-08-26 14:17 ` Fernando Alegre
2005-08-26 17:00 ` Christophe Raffalli
2005-08-26 22:58 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124781154.8832.12.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=damien.doligez@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox