From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Matt Gushee <mgushee@havenrock.com>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Snd question
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:17:44 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1124198264.13635.25.camel@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <43011A10.4090108@havenrock.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1886 bytes --]
On Mon, 2005-08-15 at 16:41 -0600, Matt Gushee wrote:
> Anu Engineer wrote:
>
> > Please forgive me if my question is very naïve, I am very new to
> Ocaml. I was
>
> > wondering why snd returns an error when I use it with more than 2
> elements, why
>
> > not return the rest of the list when I apply to something larger than
> a pair ?
>
>
> Your question shows your misunderstanding: snd operates on tuples, not
> lists.
I think the original question really meant:
Why aren't "fst" and "snd" properly generic??
For example this simply *should* work:
snd (1,2,3)
and even pattern matching can't handle it:
match e with (h,t,...) ->
also should work. Felix actually supports this ugly generic
tuple projection operator:
(1,2.1).(1) // generic n'th of tuple
(1,2.1,3).(1) // n must be compile time constant
and even:
var i:int;
for_each {i=0;} {i<3} {++i;} {
print (1,2,3).[i]; // run time indexing
endl;
};
because a tuple of all the same type is an array,
but as yet I haven't found a way to make ... work in
pattern matches.
It would actually be nice to have more general support
for polyadic tuple management: for example thinking about
obtaining a slice of a tuple, or concatenating two tuples,
suggests that just getting the n'th component is special case.
This kind of thing can actually be done in a hacky way
within limits with C++ template meta-programming.
A more general mapping from a list of types (at compile time)
representing tuples should be possible: any list operation
on types is a run-time operation on values. Unfortunately
I doubt camlp4 can handle that, since it is dealing with untyped
terms. Perhaps MetaOcaml can do it?
I would love to do this in Felix .. but it requires dynamic loading.
--
John Skaller <skaller at users dot sourceforge dot net>
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 189 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-08-16 13:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-08-15 22:05 Anu Engineer
2005-08-15 22:41 ` [Caml-list] " Matt Gushee
2005-08-16 8:08 ` sejourne kevin
2005-08-16 13:17 ` skaller [this message]
2005-08-16 16:16 ` Julian Brown
2005-08-16 17:18 ` [Caml-list] " Alan Falloon
2005-08-17 6:15 ` skaller
2005-08-16 16:34 ` [Caml-list] " Jon Harrop
2005-08-16 18:16 ` Richard Jones
2005-08-16 21:42 ` Jon Harrop
2005-08-17 6:55 ` skaller
2005-08-18 8:20 ` Andrej Bauer
2005-08-18 17:51 ` skaller
2005-08-19 7:50 ` Andrej Bauer
2005-08-17 12:19 ` Alain Frisch
2005-08-17 17:21 ` skaller
2005-08-17 23:08 ` Martin Jambon
2005-08-17 6:28 ` skaller
2005-08-20 14:31 ` Brian Hurt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1124198264.13635.25.camel@localhost.localdomain \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=mgushee@havenrock.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox