From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC3EBB81 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 04:37:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from pauillac.inria.fr (pauillac.inria.fr [128.93.11.35]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAL3bdSO006474 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 04:37:39 +0100 Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA11322 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 04:37:38 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.181]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id iAL3basW006470 for ; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 04:37:37 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp217-171.lns1.syd3.internode.on.net [203.122.217.171]) by smtp1.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id iAL3b74Y081990; Sun, 21 Nov 2004 14:07:09 +1030 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Native executable symtable From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: malc Cc: Alex Baretta , caml-list In-Reply-To: References: <41935E30.3020104@yahoo.it> <20041111160949.GA13998@annexia.org> <419F664F.9020905@yahoo.it> <419F8664.8010501@baretta.com> <419F92C0.4010200@barettadeit.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1101008226.21629.26.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 21 Nov 2004 14:37:07 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A00D83.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Miltered: at nez-perce with ID 41A00D80.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 symtable:01 sourceforge:01 malc:01 wrote:01 ocaml:01 compiler:01 ocaml:01 glebe:01 061:98 nsw:01 extensible:01 native:02 snail:02 2037:02 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.0.0 X-Spam-Level: On Sun, 2004-11-21 at 06:17, malc wrote: > all signs are there that > people do not need this functionality bad enough to do anything. I certainly desire this and have requested it. But I can't see more I can do, nor can I use any patches in redistributable code. In fact I have done what I can, using Ocaml to build a compiler for a whole new language, primarily to make it possible to build an extensible high performance system. Had Ocaml been able to do this I would have concentrated on a C library wrapper generator for Ocaml instead. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net