Re: [Caml-list] Re: Efficient C++ Interfacing?

[skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>]

On Wed, 2004-07-07 at 11:02, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 June 2004 04:35, skaller wrote:
> > On Tue, 2004-06-29 at 05:58, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > >  The only sad thing about these systems is that they are not
> > > written in ocaml. :)
> >
> > An Earley parser is easy to make, RD even easier
> > although it's a bit harder in that case to get the
> > grammar right.

> I'd studied Earley parsers in an NLP course. I've no idea if it would be so 
> much easier than an ANTLR or OpenC++ parser, though. 

ANTLR and OpenC++ have several disadvantages .. not being written
in Ocaml is a rather nasty one for you and me. Not having control
of the project is also an issue, especially if you're building
something which you want to give to clients who have to build it
in turn ..


-- 
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850, 
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net



-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners