From: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
To: Kenneth Knowles <kknowles@berkeley.edu>
Cc: "Brandon J. Van Every" <vanevery@indiegamedesign.com>,
caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] build tools - good vs. fast, both cheap
Date: 17 Apr 2004 04:10:25 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1082139022.20063.136.camel@pelican.wigram> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040416160618.GA27238@tallman.kefka.frap.net>
On Sat, 2004-04-17 at 02:06, Kenneth Knowles wrote:
> These are the approaches I can see out there:
>
> (1) Monolithic automagical GNU Makefile
> (2) O'Caml script outputing make-agnostic Makefile
> (3) Command-line build-every-at-once ocaml tool
> (4) Roll your own Makefile, have the user edit it - often separated into a
> Makefile.config.
> (5) Use autoconf (why, oh why? it doesn't offer any O'Caml support)
> (6) Interscript? I don't really understand what it does and what the developer
> must do.
I'm against make. It just isn't necessary. Make is for C developers,
not Ocaml package installation. To build a package it suffices
to run a sequence of commands in a fixed order.
To understand interscript .. what does it do?
The answer is the same as tar -zxvf, except that
'extracting' a file can execute arbitrary code.
Its that simple. Here's an example:
@head(1,"My program")
Its only a demo.
@select(tangler("sample.ml")
let f x = x + x
@for i in [1..10]:
tangle("print_endline (f "+i+");")
@doc()
This demo prints 2,4, .. 20. The Python script
means: @head -- document heading level 1.
The @select(tangler("sample.ml")) .. means
"write the following stuff to sample.ml"
The @ starts an arbitrary Python command.
The select, tangler, and head functions
are just interscript library functions,
nothing special. The tangle() functions
write a string to output.
The for loop prints out
print_endline(f 1);
print_endline(f 2);
...
etc up to 10. It is just a standard Python construction,
nothing special. If you want to compile
the above program instantly, here is how to do it:
@os.system("ocamlc -c sample.ml")
Duh. It just calls Python's system function,
which is C's system function. It is more usual
to do this though:
@select(tangler("Makefile"))
all:
@tangle("\tocamlc -c sample.ml")
@doc()
and then after you run interscript you have
a makefile, and you can compile using
the ordinary 'make' command.
The point of all this is: you can do anything
you want. Its just Python script, with a little
control loop that copies lines to the weaver
for typesetting, the tangler to write a source
file, or executes them (if they start with @).
Oh yes, there is much more than that,
but this is the basic idea...
EXECISE: What does this do:
@os.system("ocaml sample.ml > sample.out")
@f = open("sample.out")
@for i in [1..10]:
tangle(f.readline())
@doc()
If you want to see a more advanced use
of the executable facilities, examine
section 6.4 of the interscript implementation
listing at http://interscript.sf.net.
What you will see there is the full
Unicode data, and code tables for something like
30 other standard character sets -- there
are hundreds of pages of character tables,
and the whole of it is generated by about
a page of code which downloads and reads
the unicode.org data files.
Here is a real example from Felix compiler.
Have you ever got annoyed at copying
things in both mli and ml files??
@head(1,'Compile time exceptions')
@python('//')
exceptions = """
open Flx_ast
open Flx_types
exception SyntaxError of string
exception ParseError of string
exception LexError of string
exception TokenError of string
exception ClientError of range_srcref * string
exception ClientError2 of range_srcref * range_srcref * string
exception SystemError of range_srcref * string
exception Exit of int
exception Bad_recursion
exception Expr_recursion of expr_t
exception Free_fixpoint of btypecode_t
exception Unresolved_return of range_srcref * string
"""
//
@h = tangler('src/flx_exceptions.ml')
@select(h)
@tangle(exceptions)
let clierr2 sr sr2 s = raise (ClientError2 (sr,sr2,s))
let clierr sr s = raise (ClientError (sr,s))
let syserr sr s = raise (SystemError (sr,s))
let catch s f = try f() with _ -> failwith s
@h = tangler('src/flx_exceptions.mli')
@select(h)
@tangle(exceptions)
val clierr: range_srcref -> string -> 'a
val clierr2: range_srcref -> range_srcref -> string -> 'a
val syserr: range_srcref -> string -> 'a
val catch: string -> (unit -> 'a) -> 'a
--
John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net
voice: 061-2-9660-0850,
snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia
Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-16 18:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-07 18:47 [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code John Goerzen
2004-04-07 20:37 ` Samuel Mimram
2004-04-07 21:05 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2002-01-04 0:43 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 0:58 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 6:24 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 7:47 ` Oleg Trott
2004-04-08 8:04 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 7:52 ` Ville-Pertti Keinonen
2004-04-08 8:15 ` Dustin Sallings
2004-04-08 13:37 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 14:56 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:14 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-08 15:26 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 15:39 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 15:58 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 17:59 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-08 18:20 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 19:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 18:29 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 6:15 ` Trevor Andrade
2004-04-13 11:17 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 13:16 ` skaller
2004-04-13 14:24 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-13 14:53 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 18:07 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI (was: Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 19:30 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 19:57 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Christophe TROESTLER
2004-04-13 20:45 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 0:34 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 5:35 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:00 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:21 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 9:17 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-14 6:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:38 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 8:32 ` Matt Gushee
2004-04-14 8:48 ` Wolfgang Müller
2004-04-14 8:40 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 17:14 ` David Brown
2004-04-14 18:50 ` [Caml-list] benefit of package management Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-15 6:46 ` [Caml-list] BSD vs. GPL Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 15:05 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 0:20 ` skaller
2004-04-15 2:36 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-15 17:48 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-14 10:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI skaller
2004-04-14 1:04 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 2:52 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 5:14 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 6:53 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-14 6:57 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <407D2075.2070104@jollys.org>
2004-04-14 16:14 ` ocamlconf on Cygwin (Re: [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake) Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-14 7:50 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-14 11:54 ` skaller
2004-04-14 16:49 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 1:05 ` skaller
2004-04-15 6:34 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 7:33 ` skaller
2004-04-15 16:00 ` Kenneth Knowles
[not found] ` <1082049025.20677.1250.camel@pelican>
2004-04-15 17:38 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-15 23:58 ` Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-16 1:16 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 6:31 ` [Caml-list] build tools - good vs. fast, both cheap Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-16 14:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 15:16 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:12 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 16:17 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 16:39 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 6:01 ` Jacques GARRIGUE
2004-04-17 6:25 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-17 9:19 ` Alain.Frisch
2004-04-16 21:53 ` William Lovas
2004-04-17 2:30 ` skaller
2004-04-17 5:47 ` Blair Zajac
2004-04-17 6:28 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 14:52 ` skaller
2004-04-16 16:06 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 18:10 ` skaller [this message]
2004-04-16 18:43 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 19:55 ` skaller
2004-04-16 18:46 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-16 18:55 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-16 20:22 ` skaller
2004-04-16 19:39 ` Richard Jones
2004-04-16 21:00 ` skaller
2004-04-15 9:47 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Markus Mottl
2004-04-15 16:38 ` skaller
2004-04-16 1:30 ` Richard Cole
2004-04-16 14:11 ` skaller
2004-04-15 1:25 ` skaller
2004-04-14 12:19 ` skaller
2004-04-14 18:21 ` [Caml-list] recompiling bytecode Brandon J. Van Every
2004-04-14 18:54 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-14 20:26 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-14 20:35 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-15 1:39 ` skaller
2004-04-14 13:03 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI vs. Ocamake Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-14 12:45 ` [Caml-list] Re: GODI Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-13 15:03 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Matt Gushee
2004-04-13 17:24 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-09 5:40 ` skaller
2004-04-08 15:30 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 16:08 ` Xavier Leroy
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 17:35 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 6:41 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:44 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-09 6:23 ` skaller
2004-04-09 6:33 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 7:37 ` skaller
2004-04-09 8:17 ` Remi Vanicat
2004-04-09 8:35 ` OT: licences (was Re: [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code) Benjamin Geer
2004-04-10 10:10 ` skaller
2004-04-09 8:36 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Markus Mottl
2004-04-10 9:59 ` skaller
2004-04-09 9:09 ` james woodyatt
2004-04-08 16:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 17:55 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-09 13:44 ` Bruno.Verlyck
2004-04-08 15:31 ` Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 19:52 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-25 23:07 ` [Caml-list] Is GCaml Dead Again? Greg K
2004-04-08 15:04 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Fernando Alegre
2004-04-08 15:22 ` Jean-Marc EBER
2004-04-09 6:44 ` Pierre Weis
2004-04-08 15:23 ` Kenneth Knowles
2004-04-08 15:38 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-08 22:31 ` Markus Mottl
2004-04-08 18:28 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2004-04-08 17:15 ` Brian Hurt
2004-04-08 18:32 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2004-04-09 5:04 ` skaller
2004-04-08 17:25 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-08 7:10 ` Basile Starynkevitch
2004-04-08 17:09 ` Issac Trotts
2004-04-07 21:32 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 20:39 ` John Goerzen
2004-04-07 21:47 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2004-04-07 22:14 ` Benjamin Geer
2004-04-08 7:49 ` skaller
2004-04-08 19:11 ` Christophe TROESTLER
[not found] ` <200404072306.15109.clement.capel@free.fr>
2004-04-07 23:25 ` clement capel
2004-04-13 21:25 ` [Caml-list] eval for OCaml Brock
2004-04-08 0:17 ` [Caml-list] Dynamically evaluating OCaml code Jon Harrop
2004-04-08 17:31 ` Walid Taha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1082139022.20063.136.camel@pelican.wigram \
--to=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=kknowles@berkeley.edu \
--cc=vanevery@indiegamedesign.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox