From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id FAA13744; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:53:38 +0100 (MET) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA13577 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:53:37 +0100 (MET) Received: from smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net [203.16.214.203]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i294rYHd015164 for ; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 05:53:35 +0100 Received: from [192.168.1.200] (ppp118-217.lns1.syd2.internode.on.net [150.101.118.217]) by smtp3.adl2.internode.on.net (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i294rRUK052873; Tue, 9 Mar 2004 15:23:29 +1030 (CST) Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Differences between interpreted/compiled code From: skaller Reply-To: skaller@users.sourceforge.net To: Eric Dahlman Cc: caml-list In-Reply-To: <0A0E269A-711D-11D8-8BF5-000393914EAA@atcorp.com> References: <0A0E269A-711D-11D8-8BF5-000393914EAA@atcorp.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1078808247.2452.3.camel@pelican.wigram> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.2 (1.2.2-4) Date: 09 Mar 2004 15:57:27 +1100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; caml-list:01 sourceforge:01 2004:99 runtime:01 ulimit:01 9660:01 glebe:01 bytecode:01 bytecode:01 behaviour:01 nsw:01 snail:02 native:02 native:02 checkout:02 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 78 On Tue, 2004-03-09 at 03:24, Eric Dahlman wrote: > What are the differences between the two execution models and could > that be contributing to my stack problems? The bytecode runtime uses a small (setable) stack. It's possible your native code uses a very much larger hardware stack: on Linux you can find or set this value with ulimit -s (in Kb). Try reducing the stack size on the native code to see if you can duplicate the bytecode behaviour. -- John Skaller, mailto:skaller@users.sf.net voice: 061-2-9660-0850, snail: PO BOX 401 Glebe NSW 2037 Australia Checkout the Felix programming language http://felix.sf.net ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners