From: skaller <skaller@ozemail.com.au>
To: Pierre Weis <pierre.weis@inria.fr>
Cc: caml-list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Question
Date: 11 Dec 2003 02:53:51 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1071071631.4023.16.camel@pelican> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200312101027.LAA20728@pauillac.inria.fr>
On Wed, 2003-12-10 at 21:27, Pierre Weis wrote:
> [...]
> > I was expecting "when" to be right distributive over "|". I find
> > OCaml's behaviour not very intuitive in such a situation.
> [...]
>
> The when construct introduces a guard to a pattern matching
> clause. This means that a when construct is global to the entire
> pattern of the clause it appears in; it means in particular that no
> when construct can be nested into a pattern and the question of its
> distributivity wrt any other construct is pointless.
>
> > Is there a good reason for this?
>
> Yes: simplicity, complexity invariants preservation for runtime
> pattern analysis decisions even in the presence of when clauses,
> easier understanding of the compiler warnings, simplicity and
> well-definedness semantics (in particular the desired invariance wrt
> the order of evaluation).
Whoa! Can you say that slower? Felix allows nested when clauses
in patterns (however it doesn't allow alternatives yet).
The current implementation is unoptimised,
I just evaluate the match of each pattern in turn until one matches.
One small difference .. the argument of a when clause is
an expression .. and felix expressions are purely functional
so there is no issue of order of evaluation changing anything.
So, what have I lost?
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-10 16:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-01 15:41 sebastien FURIC
2003-12-01 17:48 ` Remi Vanicat
2003-12-01 18:04 ` sebastien FURIC
2003-12-03 14:02 ` Damien Doligez
2003-12-10 10:27 ` Pierre Weis
2003-12-10 15:53 ` skaller [this message]
2003-12-11 9:52 ` Luc Maranget
2003-12-11 14:20 ` skaller
2003-12-11 16:56 ` Luc Maranget
2005-05-23 6:54 Question dsingh01
2005-05-23 7:40 ` [Caml-list] Question Remi Vanicat
2005-05-23 12:21 ` Jacques Carette
2005-06-08 10:06 question dsingh01
2005-06-08 15:13 ` [Caml-list] question Damien Bobillot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1071071631.4023.16.camel@pelican \
--to=skaller@ozemail.com.au \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox