Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Alexander S. Usov" <A.S.Usov@KVI.nl>
To: Samuel Mimram <Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr>
Cc: OCaml mailing list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] One question
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 18:28:31 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1046021311.12770.12.camel@kvip88.KVI.nl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20030223181203.6cf41436.Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr>

On Sun, 2003-02-23 at 18:12, Samuel Mimram wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> I think you are confusing the operators = and ==. = is used to check
> if two objects have the same "logical" contents whether == checks if 
> two objects are exactly the same in memory.
> When you type a = insert a "word", the function insert returns a new
> lex_tree which has the same contents as the variable a but is another
> object in memory. That is why I think you wanted to write :
> 
> let a = insert [] "word"
> in
> a = insert a "word" ;;
> 
> which effectively returns true. It is important to understand that the
> variable a and the result returned by the function insert are logically 
> the same but not physically.

Yes, I understand that == checks for a physical equality.
But in case the word is already present in tree I return the same
dictionary (note "raise Already" in insert). 
The idea was to make shure that the dictionary won't be modified if we
do not change anything in it.

-- 
Best regards,
  Alexander.

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


  reply	other threads:[~2003-02-23 17:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-02-23 16:29 Alexander S. Usov
2003-02-23 17:12 ` Samuel Mimram
2003-02-23 17:28   ` Alexander S. Usov [this message]
2003-02-23 17:49     ` Samuel Mimram
2003-02-23 20:59 ` Remi Vanicat

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1046021311.12770.12.camel@kvip88.KVI.nl \
    --to=a.s.usov@kvi.nl \
    --cc=Samuel.Mimram@ens-lyon.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox