From: "Soegtrop, Michael" <michael.soegtrop@intel.com>
To: Kakadu <kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com>
Cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] ocamlbuild on Windows and bash vs. cmd
Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:01:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A172CF8E1EC@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGmVoG3_qFA4xWUD3U5NZ2DMXBMiSREYrzY9m1mboMEm=Wn2UQ@mail.gmail.com>
Dear Kakadu,
> Will the powershell be more convenient?
I don't think so. It is different from bash and as long as it is different, it doesn't make much of a difference how different. ocamlbuild (as far as I can tell) wraps all commands through as shell / syscall. 99% is really simple stuff like calling an executable with a reasonable parameter list or calling ln or rm. Output redirection happens (e.g. for ocamldep), but nothing complicated.
I think it only get's bad when users have bash code in their rules - but then you are lost anyway without bash.
So I would say keep it simple and give cmd a try. It should work unless people do things like filenames with <|> in it.
best regards,
Michael
Intel Deutschland GmbH
Registered Address: Am Campeon 10-12, 85579 Neubiberg, Germany
Tel: +49 89 99 8853-0, www.intel.de
Managing Directors: Christin Eisenschmid, Christian Lamprechter
Chairperson of the Supervisory Board: Nicole Lau
Registered Office: Munich
Commercial Register: Amtsgericht Muenchen HRB 186928
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-06 14:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-06 13:38 Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-06 13:45 ` Kakadu
2016-10-06 14:01 ` Soegtrop, Michael [this message]
2016-10-06 13:55 ` Daniel Bünzli
2016-10-06 14:15 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-06 14:45 ` Gabriel Scherer
2016-10-06 16:16 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-06 17:45 ` Jeremie Dimino
2016-10-06 18:56 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2016-10-07 6:58 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-07 16:19 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-10-11 11:49 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-11 12:36 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-10-11 13:00 ` Ivan Gotovchits
2016-10-11 13:06 ` Anil Madhavapeddy
2016-10-11 13:13 ` Yaron Minsky
2016-10-11 13:27 ` Hendrik Boom
2016-10-11 13:53 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-11 15:48 ` Adrien Nader
2016-10-11 13:46 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-14 12:19 ` Manfred Lotz
2016-10-17 8:08 ` Soegtrop, Michael
2016-10-17 9:22 ` Manfred Lotz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0F7D3B1B3C4B894D824F5B822E3E5A172CF8E1EC@IRSMSX102.ger.corp.intel.com \
--to=michael.soegtrop@intel.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=kakadu.hafanana@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox