Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Dahlman <edahlman@atcorp.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] Differences between interpreted/compiled code
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:24:14 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <0A0E269A-711D-11D8-8BF5-000393914EAA@atcorp.com> (raw)

Howdy,

I am trying to track down a bug and I wonder if someone could enlighten 
me as to the difference between the execution of compiled code and byte 
code.  I remember someone on this list mention that there should not be 
any detectable difference between the two but my test is busting the 
stack in one case but no the other.  My first guess is that the 
interpreter may not be performing tail call optimization where the 
compiler is but I am not clear as to whether that counts as an 
"observable" difference.

I the code which breaks is in a library which uses an ocaml lexer and 
parser to interpret a string so as support for my running hypothesis do 
the generated parsers assume that TCO will be properly performed?

What are the differences between the two execution models and could 
that be contributing to my stack problems?

Thanks,
-Eric

-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners


             reply	other threads:[~2004-03-08 16:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-03-08 16:24 Eric Dahlman [this message]
2004-03-09  4:57 ` skaller
2004-03-09 12:16 ` Hendrik Tews
2004-03-09 16:20 ` [Caml-list] Solved: " Eric Dahlman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=0A0E269A-711D-11D8-8BF5-000393914EAA@atcorp.com \
    --to=edahlman@atcorp.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox