* [Caml-list] NaN reresentations
@ 2015-09-02 17:56 Andreas Rossberg
2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Rossberg @ 2015-09-02 17:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ocaml Mailing List
Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed?
We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as possible about float representations.
Thanks,
/Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations
2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg
@ 2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Bünzli @ 2015-09-02 18:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Rossberg; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List
Le mercredi, 2 septembre 2015 à 18:56, Andreas Rossberg a écrit :
> Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed?
I don't remember exactly but I think there may be issues with marshaling. A quick search with in the bt leads to:
http://caml.inria.fr/mantis/view.php?id=5038
But there may be other to look at.
Best,
Daniel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations
2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg
2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
@ 2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy
2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xavier Leroy @ 2015-09-02 19:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Andreas Rossberg; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1216 bytes --]
2015-09-02 10:56 GMT-07:00 Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>:
> Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable
> representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to
> create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit
> pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed?
>
It depends on the underlying hardware. For instance, with x86-32 bits,
some FP moves go through the x87 FP stack, undergoing a double -> extended
-> double conversion. These conversions turn signaling NaNs into quiet
NaNs, and I'm not sure they preserve the other bits of the NaN payload.
On other platforms, esp. x86-64 bits, I'm pretty confident that NaN bits
are preserved by copying and parameter passing.
>
> We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter
> for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as
> possible about float representations.
>
One possibility would be to represent your floats as int64 values (= their
bit-level representation), and convert only when you operate over them, e.g.
let fp_add x y = Int64.bits_of_float (Int64.float_of_bits x +.
Int64.float_of_bits y)
Best,
- Xavier
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1771 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] NaN reresentations
2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy
@ 2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andreas Rossberg @ 2015-09-02 20:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Xavier Leroy; +Cc: Ocaml Mailing List
On Sep 2, 2015, at 21:14 , Xavier Leroy <Xavier.Leroy@inria.fr> wrote:
> 2015-09-02 10:56 GMT-07:00 Andreas Rossberg <rossberg@mpi-sws.org>:
> > Does the Ocaml implementation make guarantees about the stable representation of floats? In particular, if I use Int64.float_of_bits to create a particular NaN representation, am I guaranteed that its bit pattern is maintained no matter where the value is stored or passed?
>
> It depends on the underlying hardware. For instance, with x86-32 bits, some FP moves go through the x87 FP stack, undergoing a double -> extended -> double conversion. These conversions turn signaling NaNs into quiet NaNs, and I'm not sure they preserve the other bits of the NaN payload.
>
> On other platforms, esp. x86-64 bits, I'm pretty confident that NaN bits are preserved by copying and parameter passing.
I see. Okay, in that case it seems safer not to rely on it, for the sake of portability.
> > We are currently in the process of implementing a reference interpreter for a little low-level language, and that tries to be as accurate as possible about float representations.
>
> One possibility would be to represent your floats as int64 values (= their bit-level representation), and convert only when you operate over them, e.g.
>
> let fp_add x y = Int64.bits_of_float (Int64.float_of_bits x +. Int64.float_of_bits y)
Right, that is the approach we are currently discussing. but I was wondering whether it is necessary.
Thanks!
/Andreas
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-02 20:56 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-09-02 17:56 [Caml-list] NaN reresentations Andreas Rossberg
2015-09-02 18:35 ` Daniel Bünzli
2015-09-02 19:14 ` Xavier Leroy
2015-09-02 20:56 ` Andreas Rossberg
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox