Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: "'Yotam Barnoy'" <yotambarnoy@gmail.com>
Cc: "'Goswin von Brederlow'" <goswin-v-b@web.de>,
	"'Ocaml Mailing List'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] How much optimized is the 'a option type ?
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 21:31:27 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <04ca01cf1e02$a2dc7b00$e8957100$@ffconsultancy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAN6ygO=YLesg_jX5UF=dQAS3n2th=8ELhFMYffmnSwPAB7DoNA@mail.gmail.com>

Yotam wrote:
> I don't think so. Without metadata, how do you know where one tuple member
ends and another begins?

Use static type information. When the type is known to be 'a * 'b you use
the unboxed representation. Otherwise you default to the boxed
representation.

OCaml already does this to some extent because functions that accept a tuple
are compiled to multi-argument functions (IIRC). So this would just be an
extension to handle the return value too. The same idea could be used with
many other types, e.g. unboxed optional arguments.

Cheers,
Jon.



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-01-30 21:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-01-17  7:35 Damien Guichard
2014-01-17  7:55 ` David House
2014-01-17  8:16   ` Julien Blond
2014-01-17  8:40     ` David House
2014-01-17  9:10       ` Gabriel Scherer
2014-01-17  9:22         ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-17 17:57           ` Gerd Stolpmann
2014-01-18  1:35             ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-19  6:19               ` oleg
2014-01-21  1:51                 ` Francois Berenger
2014-01-18  1:01         ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-24 10:06         ` Alain Frisch
2014-01-24 10:16           ` Alain Frisch
2014-01-24 13:32             ` Yaron Minsky
     [not found]       ` <CAK=fH+jfi=GsMYBZzmuo=V5UAWimyxiiamY2+DkLg6F0i8XHGw@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-17  9:11         ` David House
2014-01-17 11:23           ` Jonathan Kimmitt
2014-01-17 13:46             ` Nicolas Braud-Santoni
2014-01-17 13:56               ` Frédéric Bour
2014-01-17 14:02               ` Yaron Minsky
2014-01-17 14:09                 ` Simon Cruanes
2014-01-17 22:52                   ` Yaron Minsky
2014-01-18  1:37                   ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-17 14:24                 ` Gabriel Scherer
2014-01-17 22:29                   ` Yaron Minsky
2014-01-18  1:27                 ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-18  1:18             ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-20 10:16             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-20 11:23               ` Jonathan Kimmitt
2014-01-21  2:05                 ` Francois Berenger
2014-01-22 21:22                   ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-22 21:26               ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-23  9:29                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-23 23:20                   ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-23 23:28                     ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-01-24  8:22                       ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-24  8:34                         ` Andreas Rossberg
2014-01-24 16:56                           ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-27 15:29                             ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-27 16:18                               ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-01-29  7:56                                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-29  8:32                                 ` Jon Harrop
2014-01-29 16:11                                   ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-01-30 18:43                                     ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-02-01 15:58                                       ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-30 21:31                                     ` Jon Harrop [this message]
2014-01-30 21:43                                       ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-01-31  8:26                                         ` Jon Harrop
2014-02-01 15:40                                 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-27 10:03                         ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-01-17 14:36 ` Markus Mottl
2014-01-17 15:49   ` Yotam Barnoy
2014-01-17 16:22     ` Markus Mottl
2014-01-20 10:09   ` Goswin von Brederlow

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='04ca01cf1e02$a2dc7b00$e8957100$@ffconsultancy.com' \
    --to=jon@ffconsultancy.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
    --cc=yotambarnoy@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox