From: "Christoph Höger" <christoph.hoeger@tu-berlin.de>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Garbage collector woes
Date: Mon, 4 Jul 2016 18:04:17 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <03f0318e-3268-da14-d6e9-6efdcfcab567@tu-berlin.de> (raw)
Dear all,
I have a program using OCaml callbacks, one of these callbacks looks is
the following:
/* Callbacks */
CAMLprim iconv(void* user_data, double t, double const *x, double *cond) {
CAMLparam0();
CAMLlocal3(ml_t, ml_x, ml_cond);
const value desc = *((value*)user_data);
/* Wrap the values in fresh big arrays */
ml_t = caml_copy_double(t);
ml_x = caml_ba_alloc_dims(CAML_BA_FLOAT64 | CAML_BA_C_LAYOUT, 1,
(double*)x, Int_val(N(desc)));
ml_cond = caml_ba_alloc_dims(CAML_BA_FLOAT64 | CAML_BA_C_LAYOUT, 1,
cond, Int_val(MFIT(desc)));
/* call the OCaml callback */
caml_callback3(ICONV(desc), ml_t, ml_x, ml_cond);
CAMLreturn0;
}
all arguments are allocated directly in C-code, user-data is a
registered global root. I am running 4.02.3 .
However at some point in my example, the x and cond arguments are
overwritten on the stack, resulting in a segmentation fault in the ocaml
callback.
Is it possible that the GC overwrites values in this stackframe, even
though the function is announced via CAMLparam0 ? How do I write
C-functions that call back into OCaml then?
thanks alot,
Christoph
--
Christoph Höger
Technische Universität Berlin
Fakultät IV - Elektrotechnik und Informatik
Übersetzerbau und Programmiersprachen
Sekr. TEL12-2, Ernst-Reuter-Platz 7, 10587 Berlin
Tel.: +49 (30) 314-24890
E-Mail: christoph.hoeger@tu-berlin.de
next reply other threads:[~2016-07-04 16:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-07-04 16:04 Christoph Höger [this message]
2016-07-04 16:21 ` Jeremy Yallop
2016-07-04 17:06 ` Christoph Höger
2016-07-04 17:44 ` Jeremy Yallop
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=03f0318e-3268-da14-d6e9-6efdcfcab567@tu-berlin.de \
--to=christoph.hoeger@tu-berlin.de \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox