* [Caml-list] strange match error
@ 2002-03-11 22:33 Jeff Polakow
2002-03-11 23:35 ` Johan Georg Granström
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jeff Polakow @ 2002-03-11 22:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: caml-list
Hello,
I ran into a strange (I think) error and was wondering if someone
out there can help me out.
Why does the following program:
type tt = A of string * int | B;;
let f x = print_string ((fst x)^"\n");;
let g x = match x with A y -> f y | B -> ();;
produce the following response from ocaml?
# #use "caml_test.ml";;
type tt = A of string * int | B
val f : string * 'a -> unit = <fun>
File "caml_test.ml", line 3, characters 23-26:
The constructor A expects 2 argument(s), but is here applied to 1
argument(s)
Shouldn't the type reconstructor/checker realize that y is a pair?
thanks,
Jeff
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [Caml-list] strange match error
2002-03-11 22:33 [Caml-list] strange match error Jeff Polakow
@ 2002-03-11 23:35 ` Johan Georg Granström
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Johan Georg Granström @ 2002-03-11 23:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jeff Polakow; +Cc: caml-list
Jeff,
> I ran into a strange (I think) error and was wondering if someone
> out there can help me out.
>
> Why does the following program:
> type tt = A of string * int | B;;
> let f x = print_string ((fst x)^"\n");;
> let g x = match x with A y -> f y | B -> ();;
>
> produce the following response from ocaml?
> # #use "caml_test.ml";;
> type tt = A of string * int | B
> val f : string * 'a -> unit = <fun>
> File "caml_test.ml", line 3, characters 23-26:
> The constructor A expects 2 argument(s), but is here applied to 1
> argument(s)
>
> Shouldn't the type reconstructor/checker realize that y is a pair?
Nope, since it isn't. Try
type tt = A of (string * int) | B;;
if you want A to be of one argument, a pair.
The syntax is a bit obscure here...
In revised syntax, the first would read
type tt = [A of string and int | B];
and the second
type tt = [A of (string * int) | B];
which makes the difference much more clear.
Yours,
- Johan Granström
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-03-11 23:36 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-03-11 22:33 [Caml-list] strange match error Jeff Polakow
2002-03-11 23:35 ` Johan Georg Granström
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox