From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p3HLC5lB025192
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 23:12:05 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ao8BABdWq03UnwdkkGdsb2JhbAClWxQBAQEBCQkNBxQEIcJRhXEEkXg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.64,229,1301868000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="97384121"
Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net ([212.159.7.100])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 17 Apr 2011 23:12:00 +0200
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABdWq03Unw4S/2dsb2JhbAClW3fCUYVxBJF4
Received: from outmx06.plus.net ([212.159.14.18])
  by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 17 Apr 2011 22:12:00 +0100
Received: from [80.229.123.248] (helo=WinEight)
	 by outmx06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1QBZGB-0001Pb-IN; Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:11:59 +0100
From: "Jon Harrop" <jon@ffconsultancy.com>
To: "'Joel Reymont'" <joelr1@gmail.com>
Cc: "'caml-list'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
References: <4DAB16B0.70403@inria.fr> <015f01cbfd37$737f9200$5a7eb600$@ffconsultancy.com> <99825E47-E31B-4F0D-94FE-4299321B0A13@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <99825E47-E31B-4F0D-94FE-4299321B0A13@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Apr 2011 22:11:25 +0100
Message-ID: <018301cbfd44$03c47040$0b4d50c0$@ffconsultancy.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHE+iGKWnMg17411OGwVvo9zuuqVwE3whuSATD606KUXU1VIA==
Content-Language: en-gb
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] posting policy

Joel wrote:
> I wrote:
> > I've also noticed that Google Groups is no longer archiving fa.caml...
:-(
> 
> Are you talking about this?

Yes.

> "Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This
> message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Apr 24)"
> 
> It's trivial to create a caml-list Google Group and subscribe it to this
mailing list.
> It will be a read-only copy.

Groups' fa.caml has archives dating back to 1998. Wouldn't starting new
groups fragment the archives?

Cheers,
Jon.