From: "David Allsopp" <dra-news@metastack.com>
To: "'W Dan Meyer'" <wojciech.meyer@googlemail.com>,
"'bluestorm'" <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com>
Cc: <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Converting variants with only constant constructors to integers
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2010 08:42:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <013a01cb06de$32c6d930$98548b90$@romulus.metastack.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <877hma78xf.fsf@gmail.com>
W Dan Meyer wrote:
> bluestorm <bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Beware that "%identity" is an unsafe feature that breaks all safety
> > guarantees if used badly.
>
> Yes %identity is another solution. Although as safe as Obj.magic.
It's a bit pedantic but the %identity *primitive* is not the evil thing -
what is evil about Obj.magic is that it has an illegal type, namely 'a ->
'b. %identity constrained to a type like foo -> int is a safe use of it
(obviously with the side-condition that foo only has constant constructors,
as noted - but that's a local check, i.e. in your code, not your callers').
Incidentally, the general function for getting a unique integer for a
variant type with non-constant constructors isn't that bad either:
let int_of_gen x =
let x = Obj.repr x
in
if Obj.is_block x
then -1 * Obj.tag x - 1
else (Obj.magic x : int)
Naturally, any specific use should constrain the type of this function
beyond 'a -> int
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-08 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-07 18:07 Török Edwin
2010-06-07 18:25 ` [Caml-list] " W Dan Meyer
2010-06-07 18:45 ` bluestorm
[not found] ` <87sk4y7lc7.fsf@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <4C0D3B0F.4060502@gmail.com>
2010-06-07 18:32 ` Török Edwin
2010-06-07 18:50 ` W Dan Meyer
2010-06-07 18:48 ` David Allsopp
2010-06-07 19:46 ` Török Edwin
2010-06-07 19:56 ` bluestorm
2010-06-07 22:51 ` W Dan Meyer
2010-06-08 7:42 ` David Allsopp [this message]
2010-06-08 7:59 ` bluestorm
2010-06-08 9:14 ` David Allsopp
2010-06-08 9:36 ` Luc Maranget
2010-06-08 9:45 ` David Allsopp
2010-06-08 9:51 ` Luc Maranget
2010-06-08 10:21 ` David Allsopp
2010-06-08 10:21 ` Dario Teixeira
2010-06-08 11:28 ` Kaustuv Chaudhuri
2010-06-08 11:40 ` bluestorm
2010-06-08 14:37 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-06-08 18:22 ` Kaustuv Chaudhuri
2010-06-09 1:34 ` Jacques Garrigue
2010-08-23 14:36 ` Damien Doligez
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='013a01cb06de$32c6d930$98548b90$@romulus.metastack.com' \
--to=dra-news@metastack.com \
--cc=bluestorm.dylc@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=wojciech.meyer@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox