From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from majordomo@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id JAA07783; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:57 +0200 (MET DST) X-Authentication-Warning: pauillac.inria.fr: majordomo set sender to owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr using -f Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA08739 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:56 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from mail0.jaist.ac.jp (mail0.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.5.97]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i387SrYM030799 for ; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 09:28:54 +0200 Received: from smtp.jaist.ac.jp (proxy-isc.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.5.30]) by mail0.jaist.ac.jp (3.7W-jaist_mail) with ESMTP id i387SqQ13777; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:28:52 +0900 (JST) Received: from euclid (ks36w0f13.jaist.ac.jp [150.65.64.73]) by smtp.jaist.ac.jp (3.7W-smtp) with SMTP id i387Si203974; Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:28:44 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <011701c41d39$4bc01f40$49404196@euclid> From: "Stijn De Saeger" To: "james woodyatt" , "Vasili Galchin" Cc: "caml-list" References: <20040407230339.76481.qmail@web41212.mail.yahoo.com> Subject: Re: OCaml's Cathedral & Bazaar (was Re: [Caml-list] Completeness of "Unix" run-time library) Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2004 16:15:39 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 X-Miltered: at concorde by Joe's j-chkmail ("http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr")! X-Loop: caml-list@inria.fr X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml's:01 caml-list:01 run-time:01 erlang:01 ocaml:01 unix:02 library:03 suppose:03 cathedral:95 definition:06 completeness:93 examples:07 standard:07 i'm:07 language:10 Sender: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr Precedence: bulk X-Keywords: X-UID: 127 > Seriously, and I'm trying to be helpful here, it is not the scientists > who decide what is useful to industry. It is industry that decides > what are the useful applications of research. If industry wants a > standard definition of a language system with all the features of > Ocaml, then industry will make one. agreed. As for examples, I suppose Erlang is as good as they come. stijn. ------------------- To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners