From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,DNS_FROM_RFC_ABUSE, DNS_FROM_RFC_POST,SPF_NEUTRAL autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764E3BC69 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:01:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vms044pub.verizon.net (vms044pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.44]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id l62L0xKQ009725 for ; Mon, 2 Jul 2007 23:01:00 +0200 Received: from johnyaya ([151.201.127.58]) by vms044.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-6.01 (built Apr 3 2006)) with ESMTPA id <0JKK008M9L0XMXK1@vms044.mailsrvcs.net> for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Mon, 02 Jul 2007 16:00:39 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 17:00:34 -0400 From: "Grant Olson" Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Ocaml license In-reply-to: <4a051d930707011906t3ece47ccw9253d299932eff92@mail.gmail.com> To: "'Christopher L Conway'" Cc: Message-id: <004201c7bcec$09a6f970$ac01a8c0@johnyaya> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3138 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Thread-index: Ace8TYyOTnhS97SbRvab5H3JHDCUPgAnbO8Q X-Miltered: at concorde with ID 4689678B.002 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail . ensmp . fr)! X-Spam: no; 0.00; ocaml:01 ocaml:01 lgpl:01 lgpl:01 verizon:98 caml-list:01 modifying:02 reproduce:03 library:03 library:03 generated:05 message-----:05 chris:06 standard:07 components:08 > -----Original Message----- > From: christopherleeconway@gmail.com > > You shouldn't have to worry about the OCaml license at all. > The LGPL allows you to distribute code that merely links > against the standard library (as opposed to extending or > modifying the library code) under a license of your choosing. > > Chris > Thanks, but I'm asking if I still need to indicate that I'm using LGPL code and reproduce the copywrite, or the the generated .exe is considered a separate work. That is, does it link to any of the LGPL code? And the same question with the Q-licensed components.