From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id KAA00775 for caml-red; Tue, 31 Oct 2000 10:49:39 +0100 (MET) Received: from concorde.inria.fr (concorde.inria.fr [192.93.2.39]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA21526 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:17:36 +0100 (MET) Received: from cepheus.azstarnet.com (cepheus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.195]) by concorde.inria.fr (8.11.1/8.10.0) with ESMTP id e9UFHZP20101 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 16:17:35 +0100 (MET) Received: from dylan (dialup002ip296.tus.azstarnet.com [169.197.15.40]) by cepheus.azstarnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA04279 for ; Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:17:32 -0700 (MST) X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/ Message-ID: <003e01c04285$1e7fa7e0$210148bf@dylan> From: "David McClain" To: Subject: Where did the exception occur? Date: Mon, 30 Oct 2000 08:21:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: weis@pauillac.inria.fr Here is another one to think about... I once wrote a major program in OCaml using CPS. This is a nightmare to traceback since every function exits by calling another. How would a stack frame help here? You don't have infinite memory. - DM