From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.3 (2006-06-01) on yquem.inria.fr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=disabled version=3.1.3 Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by yquem.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F59BC6C for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:26:59 +0100 (CET) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgAAALvkokfC2fJVlmdsb2JhbACQLQEBAQEHBAYHChEHnXY X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.25,291,1199660400"; d="scan'208";a="8619615" Received: from anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net ([194.217.242.85]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 01 Feb 2008 18:26:59 +0100 Received: from orion.metastack.com ([80.177.38.218]) by anchor-post-35.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.67) id 1JKzfA-000P8g-Hm for caml-list@yquem.inria.fr; Fri, 01 Feb 2008 17:26:55 +0000 Received: from countertenor (cpc1-cmbg6-0-0-cust264.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [81.101.137.9]) (authenticated bits=0) by orion.metastack.com (8.13.4/8.13.3) with ESMTP id m11HB1Ua006557 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:11:02 GMT From: "David Allsopp" To: References: Subject: RE: [Caml-list] [OSR] Caml Community Code Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:26:44 -0000 Organization: MetaStack Solutions Ltd. Message-ID: <003d01c864f7$9e3c97d0$6c7ba8c0@countertenor> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Thread-Index: AchkE2mqC74z+QlEQt2JQLxM711HHQALs1Lw X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.63 on 172.16.28.218 X-Spam: no; 0.00; camlp:01 syntax:01 syntax:01 camlp:01 parser:01 parsers:01 caml-list:01 grammar:02 caml:02 revised:02 standard:07 composed:07 correct:08 file:11 sort:12 > I also think we should have one CamlP4 grammar with all the community's > agreed upon "standard" syntax extensions (sort of a "new revised" > syntax?) Am I correct in thinking that you can only use one camlp4 parser per source file - i.e. that parsers cannot be automatically composed, even if that is logically (grammatically) possible? David