From: "Mattias Waldau" <mattias.waldau@abc.se>
To: "'Xavier Leroy'" <xavier.leroy@inria.fr>,
"'Caml List'" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Cc: <zielony@cs.net.pl>
Subject: RE: [Caml-list] Toplevel question ...
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2002 11:41:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <003001c1c4fb$8287ae50$765da8c0@gateway> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020306112445.C3357@pauillac.inria.fr>
So it would be as if
expr ;;
whould have been written as
let it = expr ;;
in the top-level. Since I currently often write
let x = expr ;;
it would save me 9 keystrokes. I think it is a good idea.
(But I think that soon people would ask you to keep all the
lines, so that we would write it.(4) instead.)
/mattias
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr
> [mailto:owner-caml-list@pauillac.inria.fr] On Behalf Of Xavier Leroy
> Sent: Wednesday, March 06, 2002 11:25 AM
> To: Caml List
> Cc: zielony@cs.net.pl
> Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Toplevel question ...
>
>
> > Is there some alias in toplevel for the result of last
> evaluation so
> > one could use it instead of retyping (there's no history completion
> > :() and binding to some name?
>
> The original Caml V3.1 had such a facility -- all results of
> toplevel evaluations were bound to the name "it". This was
> removed in Caml Light because of the way Caml Light handles
> toplevel binding: all bindings accumulate forever, preventing
> the GC from reclaiming the memory space used. Early versions
> of Objective Caml had the same problem as Caml Light, but
> this was fixed in version 3.01: only the values of lexically
> visible toplevel definitions are kept.
>
> So, technically, it would be feasible to resurrect the Caml V3.1
> behavior: evaluating "expr ;;" at top-level binds the result
> value to the name "it". Do others think that it would be useful?
>
> - Xavier Leroy
> -------------------
> To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives:
http://caml.inria.fr Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/ Beginner's list:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-03-06 10:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-28 15:49 Andrzej M. Ostruszka
2002-03-01 9:36 ` Tomasz Zielonka
2002-03-02 10:25 ` [Caml-list] " Andrzej M. Ostruszka
2002-03-06 10:24 ` [Caml-list] " Xavier Leroy
2002-03-06 10:41 ` Mattias Waldau [this message]
2002-03-06 17:33 ` shiv
2002-03-06 16:48 Harrison, John R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='003001c1c4fb$8287ae50$765da8c0@gateway' \
--to=mattias.waldau@abc.se \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=xavier.leroy@inria.fr \
--cc=zielony@cs.net.pl \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox