From: "FabienFleutot" <fleutotf@esiee.fr>
To: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell)
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:25:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002d01c0b5f8$3cc0f790$2532d793@fabien> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0103241014050.1801-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
> > My team found it easier to learn erlang, for example. However, people
> > love the strong type checking, and the fact that if it compiles its
> > likely to run correctly... The english translation of the horse book
should
> > help.
>
> Yes, how is that coming? I hope that ugly horse can get replaced by a
> beautiful dromedary.
Unfortunately it won't happen: Perl users have allready `copyrigthed' this
animal...
Anyway, I'd be pleased to know: Why a horse?
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr. Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-03-28 7:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-24 3:17 Arturo Borquez
2001-03-24 8:03 ` Vijay Chakravarthy
2001-03-24 18:38 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-03-24 21:55 ` Vijay Chakravarthy
2001-03-26 0:29 ` Dennis Gang Chen
2001-03-26 3:03 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-03-26 9:34 ` BDD and Ocaml (was: Re: [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML?) David Mentre
2001-03-26 15:44 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-03-30 14:37 ` [Caml-list] OCaml binding to cmuBDD David Mentre
2001-03-26 14:10 ` [Caml-list] Why not article in journal ? (was Why People Aren't Using OCAML?) Christophe Raffalli
2001-03-26 12:43 ` Xavier Leroy
2001-03-26 13:25 ` FabienFleutot [this message]
2001-03-28 8:23 ` [Caml-list] [ora book] Why a horse? David Mentre
2001-03-29 13:48 ` [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell) Xavier Leroy
2001-03-29 14:05 ` Daniel de Rauglaudre
2001-03-29 14:14 ` Xavier Urbain
2001-03-29 14:38 ` Jean-Francois Monin
2001-03-29 16:19 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-03-27 23:43 ` John Max Skaller
2001-03-28 4:37 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-03-28 14:24 ` Joshua D. Guttman
2001-03-28 19:32 ` William Chesters
2001-03-27 3:43 ` Chris Hecker
2001-03-27 8:57 ` wester
2001-03-30 18:59 ` John Max Skaller
2001-03-28 22:00 ` Joseph R. Kiniry
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2001-03-29 14:26 Toby Moth
2001-03-23 18:04 [Caml-list] recursive modules redux, & interface files Brian Rogoff
2001-03-23 20:35 ` [Caml-list] Why People Aren't Using OCAML? (was Haskell) Mattias Waldau
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002d01c0b5f8$3cc0f790$2532d793@fabien' \
--to=fleutotf@esiee.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox