From: "Warp" <warplayer@free.fr>
To: "Will Benton" <willb@cs.wisc.edu>, "Stefano Lanzavecchia" <stf@apl.it>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCamlSDL
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2002 19:20:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002601c1e7c6$86c123f0$3900a8c0@warp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020419112730.D30809@cilantro.cs.wisc.edu>
> > It's really hard to define "better"... Beauty is in the eye of the
> > beholder...
>
> Sure.
>
> However, OpenGL has two major advantages over Direct3D even if you
> don't consider how easy it is to use or how efficient it is:
> 1. It is not controlled by a single company (especially not a
> convicted predatory monopolist). A sub-point of this is that
> many implementations are available for many different platforms.
> 2. O'Caml bindings are already available for OpenGL.
For the 1st point , I do agree, but actually Microsoft is really well
supporting DirectX , and sometimes it's better to have only one company
behind a product, because you don't have to care about driver compatibility
and all MCD/ICD/etc.... stuff of OpenGL which isn't very nice :)
For the 2nd point, I didn't want such a low-level interface.
Nicolas Cannasse
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-19 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-18 14:32 Luc Mazardo
2002-04-18 22:03 ` Warp
2002-04-19 15:49 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-19 15:58 ` Warp
2002-04-19 16:06 ` Will Benton
2002-04-19 16:13 ` Stefano Lanzavecchia
2002-04-19 16:27 ` Will Benton
2002-04-19 17:20 ` Warp [this message]
2002-04-20 9:06 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-20 12:22 ` Tim Freeman
2002-04-20 12:51 ` Sven
2002-04-22 6:55 ` Tom
2002-04-22 20:05 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-21 22:56 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-22 6:53 ` William Chesters
2002-04-23 14:50 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-23 15:12 ` Stefano Lanzavecchia
2002-04-24 1:00 ` Jacques Garrigue
2002-04-24 1:07 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-24 7:02 ` Sven
2002-04-24 9:04 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-24 9:31 ` Sven
2002-04-24 9:42 ` Jérôme Marant
2002-04-24 11:00 ` Jérôme Marant
2002-04-29 10:11 ` Sven
2002-04-24 16:56 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-19 17:16 ` Warp
2002-04-19 17:45 ` Sven
2002-04-19 18:01 ` Warp
2002-04-19 18:55 ` Vincent Foley
2002-04-20 6:33 ` Alan Schmitt
2002-04-20 12:16 ` Sven
2002-04-20 9:19 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-20 12:19 ` Sven
2002-04-20 14:47 ` Vitaly Lugovsky
2002-04-20 9:01 ` John Max Skaller
2002-04-21 12:13 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-21 12:27 ` Oliver Bandel
2002-04-24 14:02 Damien Doligez
2002-04-24 14:37 ` Christophe Raffalli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002601c1e7c6$86c123f0$3900a8c0@warp' \
--to=warplayer@free.fr \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=stf@apl.it \
--cc=willb@cs.wisc.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox