From: "David McClain" <dmcclain@azstarnet.com>
To: "Julian Assange" <proff@iq.org>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>, <proff@iq.org>
Subject: Re: scientific computing with ocaml, gsl api
Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 00:13:47 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002301bf994e$6ae2a3c0$250148bf@vega> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wx7leme2n9.fsf@suburbia.net>
Julian,
I'm not quite sure what you mean by Euclidean N-dimensional algebra, but NML
does already support inner and outer products of N-dimensional objects.
There are also Matrix routines for SVD, Cholesky decomposition, and LU
decomposition, inversion, and determinants, etc...
In fact one of the things I do quite frequently is a DFT demodulation of
image stacks obtained with a chopped sensor. Hence to multiply and sum the
image planes with a twiddle vector I simply do:
images <*> twiddles
and voila, the result is a single image that represents the sum of
individual weighted images. The "images" vector above is a 3-dimensional
stack of 2-D image planes, while the "twiddles" is a simple vector of scalar
(complex) weights. The "<*>" is shorthand for my inner-product operator.
I am sure that you will easily represent your force problem in the
vectorized domain of NML!
- DM
----- Original Message -----
From: Julian Assange <proff@iq.org>
To: David McClain <dmcclain@azstarnet.com>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>; <proff@iq.org>
Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2000 11:00 PM
Subject: scientific computing with ocaml, gsl api
> "David McClain" <dmcclain@azstarnet.com> writes:
>
> > Dear OCaml Enthusiasts,
> >
> > It has been stewing for more than a year now, a continuing work in
progress,
> > but it is high time that I release a matured copy of the code and
sources to
> > the world. NML (Not ML, Numeric Modeling Language, Numeric ML, Nearly
ML,
> > ...) is an interactive, dynamically typed, tail pure, compiled (to
native
> > code closures) functional language, whose syntax closely follows that of
> > OCaml, but where all math operations are overloaded and vectorized on
real
> > and complex data in the form of lists, vectors, multidimensional arrays,
> > tuples, etc.
>
> This looks very nice david! Is it possible to use the vectorised, array
support
> within ocaml? i.e I'm a little leary of using NML for mid-large
applications due
> to the lack of type checking, but it does seem to be an excellent language
for
> scientific interrogation.
>
> Have you looked at the GNU scientific library?
>
> http://sourceware.cygnus.com/gsl
>
> This is a wonderfully eclectic scientific library in C, with strong
> control over float properties. An ocaml or MNL binding would be a
> killer app.
>
> > Are there any plans to support euclidian vector algebra in n
> > dimensions? Preferably with user-defined physical field properties?
> >
> > Specifically I want to be able to do things like define two vectors,
> > v_1, and v_2, have v_1 radiate a force decreasing at 1/distance^2, and
> > calculate the the force vector across all of v_2. This is more complex
> > than simple point sources, but there doesn't even seem to be support
> > for those. It could be argued that a two body case is so trivial it
> > doesn't need supporting, which is probably true, but n body cases and
> > non point sources are hard work and useful in many (even non-physics)
> > applications. i.e the v_1, v2 example I mentioned above forms part of
> > an optimisation solution I have for laying out 2d chemical labels
> > (part-of-molecule number, atomic weight, charge, etc) over a 3d
> > polynucleartide in such a way as to avoid the labels writing accross
> > each other.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Julian
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-29 17:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-24 21:04 OCaml App (NML) Announce David McClain
2000-03-29 6:00 ` scientific computing with ocaml, gsl api Julian Assange
2000-03-29 6:38 ` David McClain
2000-03-29 7:13 ` David McClain [this message]
2000-03-29 20:08 ` David McClain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002301bf994e$6ae2a3c0$250148bf@vega' \
--to=dmcclain@azstarnet.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=proff@iq.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox