From: "Nicolas Cannasse" <warplayer@free.fr>
To: "Benjamin Geer" <ben@socialtools.net>
Cc: <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Object-oriented access bottleneck
Date: Sun, 7 Dec 2003 23:12:15 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <002201c3bccc$1e126c60$0274a8c0@PWARP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3FD30D59.2000706@socialtools.net>
> Nicolas Cannasse wrote:
> > For most of the cases, modules should be powerful enough and offer far
> > better performances... and inlining.
> > Even if you need some specialisation, you can always handle it using a
> > closure.
>
> Could you give an example?
>
> Ben
>
For example, you have a module A with a type t which have one or more
mutable fields where you can store user given closures that will perform
some specific tasks. Theses closures can be seen has type "methods" , and if
the type is visible, you can even do some runtime subclassing.
Nicolas Cannasse
-------------------
To unsubscribe, mail caml-list-request@inria.fr Archives: http://caml.inria.fr
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs FAQ: http://caml.inria.fr/FAQ/
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-12-07 14:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-12-07 2:39 Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 2:59 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-07 11:22 ` Benjamin Geer
2003-12-07 14:12 ` Nicolas Cannasse [this message]
2003-12-07 18:04 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 10:27 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-07 19:46 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 1:07 ` Jacques Garrigue
2003-12-08 15:08 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 15:42 ` Richard Jones
2003-12-09 0:26 ` Nicolas Cannasse
2003-12-09 12:10 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-09 13:17 ` Olivier Andrieu
2003-12-09 13:53 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 17:51 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:19 ` brogoff
2003-12-08 20:09 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 19:02 ` Xavier Leroy
2003-12-08 21:37 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 21:06 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 22:30 ` malc
2003-12-07 18:23 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 18:14 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-07 19:30 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-07 23:50 ` Abdulaziz Ghuloum
2003-12-08 17:29 ` Brian Hurt
2003-12-08 18:48 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 10:17 ` Nuutti Kotivuori
2003-12-08 19:51 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='002201c3bccc$1e126c60$0274a8c0@PWARP' \
--to=warplayer@free.fr \
--cc=ben@socialtools.net \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox