From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: (from weis@localhost) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) id MAA15257 for caml-redistribution; Wed, 3 Feb 1999 12:04:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from nez-perce.inria.fr (nez-perce.inria.fr [192.93.2.78]) by pauillac.inria.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id FAA07836 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 05:12:19 +0100 (MET) Received: from pegasus.azstarnet.com (pegasus.azstarnet.com [169.197.56.194]) by nez-perce.inria.fr (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA20722 for ; Mon, 1 Feb 1999 05:12:17 +0100 (MET) Received: from dylan (dialup17ip063.tus.azstarnet.com [169.197.38.63]) by pegasus.azstarnet.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with SMTP id VAA05207 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:12:00 -0700 (MST) X-Sent-via: StarNet http://www.azstarnet.com/ Message-ID: <000901be4d99$1c2e1630$210148bf@dylan> From: "David McClain" To: "Liste CAML" Subject: Wishlist! Date: Sun, 31 Jan 1999 21:12:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.5 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: weis Gee, OCAML is such a pleasure to use, and invariably, when I have a bug, = it turns out to be in my external C routines. It sure would be nice if = OCAML is someday extended to support a wider variety of datatypes (e.g., = bytes, shorts, longs, floats, etc.) so that I can just skip this = wasteful practice of coding in C. We could then enjoy using OCAML for = all the systems level programming chores that plague us on a daily = basis! I still can't get over the amazement I have when, after making = substantial architectural changes to existing code, that it works so = well and without any bugs! I have never seen anything quite like it = before! David McClain Sr. Scientist Raytheon Missile Systems Co. Tucson, AZ http://www.azstarnet.com/~dmcclain/homepage.htm