From: tab@snarc.org (Vincent Hanquez)
To: skaller <skaller@users.sourceforge.net>
Cc: "Markus E.L." <ls-ocaml-developer-2006@m-e-leypold.de>,
caml-list@yquem.inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve.
Date: Thu, 24 May 2007 13:22:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20070524112226.GA23569@snarc.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1180000262.10335.15.camel@rosella.wigram>
On Thu, May 24, 2007 at 07:51:02PM +1000, skaller wrote:
> Can't you can fix that by:
>
> module xx : sig .. end = struct
> ..
> end include xx
>
> That way all the symbols you want are in the .ml
> file.
Yes that would kind of work, however that generate an ugly signature
with ocamlc -i (I know i'm beeing difficult here ;))
> However this isn't really the same as
>
> private val f: int -> int
> let f x = ..
>
> which can be done by:
>
> let f (x:int):int = ..
>
> the problem being it is invasive (you have to
> edit the function decl instead of writing a
> separate type decl).
I like the separation personally. Haskell has it, and I found it quite neat.
Cheers,
--
Vincent Hanquez
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-05-24 11:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-05-22 22:10 David Teller
2007-05-22 22:22 ` [Caml-list] " William D. Neumann
2007-05-23 13:07 ` David Teller
2007-05-22 22:26 ` Erik de Castro Lopo
2007-05-22 23:16 ` skaller
2007-05-23 2:46 ` David Thomas
2007-05-23 9:19 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-05-23 12:49 ` Brian Hurt
2007-05-23 13:36 ` Gerd Stolpmann
2007-05-23 14:06 ` skaller
2007-05-23 14:54 ` Florian Hars
2007-05-23 15:11 ` Brian Hurt
2007-05-23 21:48 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-05-24 8:04 ` Markus E.L.
2007-05-24 8:32 ` Vincent Hanquez
2007-05-24 9:51 ` skaller
2007-05-24 11:22 ` Vincent Hanquez [this message]
2007-05-23 13:55 ` David Teller
2007-05-22 23:19 ` skaller
2007-05-23 10:41 ` Richard Jones
2007-05-23 13:04 ` David Teller
2007-05-24 13:51 ` Richard Jones
2007-05-24 14:00 ` Robert Fischer
2007-05-24 14:00 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-24 14:20 ` Robert Fischer
2007-05-24 14:34 ` David Teller
2007-05-24 14:21 ` skaller
2007-05-22 23:39 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-23 18:54 ` Richard Jones
2007-05-23 19:27 ` Robert C Fischer
2007-05-23 19:34 ` Brian Hurt
2007-05-23 19:54 ` Robert Fischer
2007-05-23 21:46 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-23 22:14 ` Jacques Garrigue
2007-05-24 1:38 ` Revolution Jon Harrop
2007-05-24 2:40 ` [Caml-list] Revolution skaller
2007-05-24 3:21 ` Chris King
2007-05-24 14:24 ` David Teller
2007-05-24 13:40 ` [Caml-list] Teaching bottomline, part 3: what should improve Brian Hurt
2007-05-23 19:29 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-23 20:20 ` David Teller
2007-05-24 14:18 ` Jon Harrop
2007-05-24 14:23 ` skaller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20070524112226.GA23569@snarc.org \
--to=tab@snarc.org \
--cc=caml-list@yquem.inria.fr \
--cc=ls-ocaml-developer-2006@m-e-leypold.de \
--cc=skaller@users.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox