Mailing list for all users of the OCaml language and system.
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Pierre Weis <Pierre.Weis@inria.fr>
To: luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr (Sven LUTHER)
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Redefinition doesn't work
Date: Tue, 31 Oct 2000 17:47:58 +0100 (MET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200010311647.RAA05334@pauillac.inria.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001031125223.A24595@lambda.u-strasbg.fr> from Sven LUTHER at "Oct 31, 100 12:52:23 pm"

> Isn't it possible to have a rebind or something such keyboard, that would test
> that the type of the newly binded value is the same as the old value, or maybe
> even something larger than that ?
> 
> Friendly,
> 
> Sven LUTHER

It is not only a question of type. As I mentioned in my previous
message, if you allow the user to ``rebind'' some basic functions,
such as map or iter, the behaviour of the compiler can be
unpredictable.

Friendly,

Pierre Weis

INRIA, Projet Cristal, Pierre.Weis@inria.fr, http://cristal.inria.fr/~weis/




  reply	other threads:[~2000-10-31 16:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <200010300739.IAA13016@pauillac.inria.fr>
2000-10-30 23:38 ` Jaeyoun Chung
2000-10-31 11:06   ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-31 11:52     ` Sven LUTHER
2000-10-31 16:47       ` Pierre Weis [this message]
2000-10-31 18:55         ` Stefan Monnier
2000-11-02 15:42           ` Pierre Weis
2000-11-03  3:10             ` Stefan Monnier
2000-11-03  8:44             ` Good programming languages (Was: Redefinition doesn't work) Mattias Waldau
2000-11-03 15:27               ` bcpierce
2000-11-06  0:17                 ` Jacques Garrigue
2000-11-08 18:42                 ` Markus Mottl
2000-11-09 16:20                   ` Juan J. Quintela
2000-11-10 10:06                     ` Markus Mottl
2000-11-13  7:48                       ` Stephan Houben
2000-11-10 19:06                     ` Remi VANICAT
2000-11-06  6:17               ` Francisco Reyes
2000-11-07 17:36                 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-10-31 14:16     ` Redefinition doesn't work Frank Atanassow
2000-10-31 17:07       ` Pierre Weis
2000-10-31 17:26         ` LINUX MANDRAKE -> CAMLTK? mlf
2000-11-02 20:21           ` Pierre Weis
2000-11-02 22:45 Redefinition doesn't work Ruchira Datta
2000-11-03  9:13 ` Pierre Weis
2000-11-03 10:09   ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2000-11-03 16:56     ` Pierre Weis
2000-11-03 17:36       ` Michel Mauny
2000-11-05 11:15       ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
2000-11-06 21:30         ` Bruce Hoult
2000-11-03 16:58   ` Pierpaolo BERNARDI
2000-11-06  9:29     ` Stephan Houben
2000-11-03 17:30   ` Stefan Monnier
2000-11-05 11:16     ` Michael Sperber [Mr. Preprocessor]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-10-31 19:11 Ruchira Datta
2000-11-02 18:05 ` Trevor Jim
2000-10-28  7:32 Mattias Waldau
2000-10-28 16:37 ` Pierre Weis

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200010311647.RAA05334@pauillac.inria.fr \
    --to=pierre.weis@inria.fr \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=luther@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox